Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 13,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 4:08 pm
We do not hold that, as a matter of law, sexual-assault allegations can never “relate to” someone’s employment. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
Pataki, 516 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2008). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
Accordingly, the Second Circuit held that "[f]ederal review of the 2007 amendments here would unduly disrupt the administration of the New York WCL, would interfere with matters of substantial public concern and would hamper resolution by the state of challenges similar to those made here. [read post]
17 May 2013, 12:29 pm
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 572 (2d Cir.1968) (Judge Lumbard, dissenting from remand)). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
It’s simply a matter of status. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:00 am
Get this s–t the f–k out of here. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:55 am
" It was not clear why no one called police to report the hostage crisis, or for that matter how the salon got away with this for at least several months. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:54 pm
In a sense, it hardly matters: important social thinkers have an impressive record of missing the point and still surviving to cast a shadow another day (think Marx, Hayek, Schumpeter). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Thompson, 947 F.2d 666, 676 (3d Cir. 1991) (so holding as a First Amendment matter, but concluding that Pennsylvan [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
Judgments, Recognition, Enforcement Prof Dr Wolfgang Hau, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich Discussion 3.30 p.m. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
Excel Communications, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:07 am
Everyone follows the sun, and so I’ll follow the sun too. * * * In equilibrium it doesn’t matter what our watches say, and so Daylight Savings Time makes no difference to what we do. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
’); Morrison Grain, 632 F.2d at 429 (‘[T]he burden of proof generally is upon the insured to show that a loss arose from a covered peril. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 10:29 am
Which means actual back and forth between the criminally convicted (there's a technical issue on that in the Conliff transcript excerpt, but it didn't matter in that case and certainly doesn't matter here) and the trial judge. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
Whataburger of Alice, Inc., 174 F.3d 599, 603 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing Save Power, 121 F.3d at 950; West Gulf Maritime, 751 F.2d at 728). [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
Supp. 115, 117 (S.D.N.Y. 1982); Application of Sentinel Gov't Sec., 530 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
Diffie, 177 F.3d 503, 506 (6th Cir. 1999). [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 8:02 am
New Horizon Warehouse Distrib., 67 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
For many clients, this will not matter. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:58 pm
" "[T]here appeared to be no [felony] state crime in play. [read post]
