Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 3221 - 3240 of 3,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court affirmed a decision to prohibit hospitals from changing their formula for reimbursing hospitals through Medicaid without going through the proper procedures. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:37 am
In April, Jack Weinstein, a federal judge in Brooklyn, N.Y., threw out a conviction in a highly unusual manner. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:47 am
 SUPREME COURTS (78%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (77%);  ...NEW YORK, USA (94%)     4. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
I don’t think the Supreme Court has expressly repudiated criminal defamation, but it has certainly implied that criminal defamation statute laws are not kosher and many states in response have moved away from these laws. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:42 pm
The design professionals argued that the legislature’s action was unconstitutional; however, the Minnesota Supreme Court disagreed and allowed the state’s claims for indemnity against the engineer to stand.Not wishing to wait for their respective legislatures to act, some businesses are resorting to the courts to seek relief from these types of coverage exclusions. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:42 pm
The design professionals argued that the legislature’s action was unconstitutional; however, the Minnesota Supreme Court disagreed and allowed the state’s claims for indemnity against the engineer to stand.Not wishing to wait for their respective legislatures to act, some businesses are resorting to the courts to seek relief from these types of coverage exclusions. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Eugene Volokh
., (N.Y. trial ct. 1995); Restatement (Second) of Torts §581 (1976); cf. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am by Keith Lee
… The Supreme Court has recognized three types of searches in which more is required than simple application of the border search doctrine. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court law which, in order to protect the administration of justice, allows a court to restrict a party’s extrajudicial speech that is “substantially likely to have a materially prejudicial effect” or that presents a “‘reasonable likelihood’ of a serious and imminent threat” to the integrity of the trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
The judge reviewed a New York Supreme Court case in which that court dismissed an accusatory instrument charging that defendant with harassment because the charging document recited the defendant’s threat to the complaining parties but did not include non [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:36 am by John Day
Farmingdale Classroom Teachers’ Ass’n, Inc., 343 N.E.2d 278, 283 (N.Y. 1975). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
When I saw that the site featured an article on the history of the Supreme Court’s Daubert decision, I decided to give the site another try. [read post]