Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 12:43 pm
SOLO IP features an open letter from Barbara Cookson to the new leadership of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and a list of likely calamities faced by medium-sized legal practices that may be either of concern or of complete irrelevance to sole and small IP practices. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:00 am
Because "[t]he authority to control immigration . . . is vested solely in the Federal Government," Truax v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
The facts in Heineman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
Demetriades v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:23 pm
In all but one of the cases before the Court, the government won solely on lack of substantial burden, with only the D.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:37 pm
For example, in Ehling v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales came up with a decision that was as predictable as the fact that the trial judge's ruling was going to be appealed in Starbucks (HK) Ltd & Another v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1465. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Reject of three possible approaches: (1) solely determined by national law, given that it’s mandatory and normative; (2) informed by relevant state practice; (3) synonymous with three-step test. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
The test was phrased well by Justice Brandeis in Kellogg v National Biscuit: "...the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer". [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:30 pm
As to inducement, the court pointed to nothing that would meet the high standard of MGM Studios v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm
Dandamudi v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
The court would have to send a copy of the draft order to people who have registered an interest in seeing such orders and include sufficient information to provide them with a basis to challenge the application. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:15 pm
In Gilardi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
Lhamon, Neal v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Just as Loving v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:27 pm
But feel free to send us questions to our website at WallStreetversusMainStreet.com or Wall Street V MainStreet.com and we’ll try to answer those in a future show. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am
Actual Duties Must Be Considered In a recent decision in Richard Sewell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm
PUMA SE at al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:59 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
