Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 9,595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
The district court had found that the statute violated the First Amendment by forcing doctors to speak the state’s message, but the court of appeals, over four dissenting votes, reversed. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
McChristian v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Ghada Hanna v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Ghada Hanna v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
McChristian v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:15 am
Facts: This case (Goldin v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:26 am
The doctors agreed that the throwing up is consistent with a concussion following a head trauma. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
In the case, Pipkin v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
In the case, Pipkin v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
She attached a vague doctor's note. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
” Wipf v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
” Wipf v. [read post]
California Appeals Court Holds Negligence Action Against Therapist is Barred by Litigation Privilege
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
California Appeals Court Holds Negligence Action Against Therapist is Barred by Litigation Privilege
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Jacqueline McChristian v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Jacqueline McChristian v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Sandra Hall v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Sandra Hall v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
Clements a second kick at the financial can, the SCC majority either chose to ignore this point or overlooked it. ** If you care, this is the text of Fox v Danis at para. 26: [26] The trial judge was not bound to either accept the doctor’s evidence in its entirety, including his conclusion, or dismiss it completely; she was entitled to “accept parts of the testimony, reject other parts of it and make appropriate findings”: R. v. [read post]
