Search for: "State v. May" Results 3221 - 3240 of 120,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
  The Hiestand complaint alleges (among other things) a UCL "unlawful" prong claim predicated on violation of Vehicle Code section 22651, which reads, in part: A peace officer ... of a city, county, or jurisdiction of a state agency in which a vehicle is located, may remove a vehicle located within the territorial limits in which the officer ... may act, under the following circumstances: .... [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
Safe Harbor framework loom, there have been several recent developments that may be of interest to businesses operating in the European Union and United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
Safe Harbor framework loom, there have been several recent developments that may be of interest to businesses operating in the European Union and United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:00 am by Emily Siu
Some of our employer readers (and clients) may recall scrambling to update their employment contracts following the 2020 release of Waksdale v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Moreover, a person faced with such a law may ignore it and exercise his First Amendment rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
The CJEU today (in case in C-421/13, Apple Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, see here) confirmed that the representation of the layout of a retail store, such as the one depicted below, may - subject to certain conditions - be registered as a trade mark. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:44 am by christopher
United States, 144 U.S. 47, 59 (1892)United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:49 am by Wells Bennett
Down at Guantanamo, pre-trial proceedings will resume this morning in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm by John Pollock
  But Turner may not be the last word even on the federal constitutional right to counsel in civil cases any more than Betts v. [read post]