Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 15,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Rosalind English
David Thomas Howarth v  Commissioner of Police of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 2818 (QB) – read judgment Protestors have to put up with “sensible and good natured” controls by the authorities as a limitation on their rights to free expression and assembly, the Divisional Court has ruled. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On January 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
While Epic hasn't yet filed a notice of who will be its lead counsel, I presume--based on the appellate briefs--that Thomas C. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
Via Scotusblog, he United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Arave v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Erin Miller
  Justice Thomas writes for the Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]