Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 3221 - 3240 of 9,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by Mailee Smith
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone… [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:59 am
United States, 514 U.S. 695, 703 (1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Thomas Key
United States, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that public display occurs "each time an individual computer user accesses the relevant page on a website that displays the work. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 According to Allen, Toyota USA “sells Toyota Parts in the United States at prices substantially higher than those charged by Toyota in other places. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
TBMP § 1113.01.Early Recognition claimed the right to exclusive use of the subject mark for the entire United States, except for the County of San Francisco within the state of California. [read post]