Search for: "University System v. State" Results 3221 - 3240 of 8,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair values, Information… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
At the founding, the law of nations was considered a distinct “system of rules, deducible by natural reason, and established by universal consent among the civilized inhabitants of the world,” 4 Blackstone 66. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
This vision of the pardon power has not been universal in the court’s history: In Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
Quam-Wickham is a professor of history at California State University, in Long Beach. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:05 am by Howard Friedman
Eisenstadt, Enemy and Ally: Religion in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Crossing the Line in Voir Dire The Utah Court of Appeals rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On the same day that the Court decided Upper Skagit, it decided in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Sections 34 to 42 and Schedule 15 set out the new system for exemplary damages and costs, as well as defining those who meet the definition of a ‘relevant publisher’ to whom the new system of exemplary damages will apply. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The few cases we see are examples of patterns which exist more broadly in the justice system, but only rarely show up in state appellate court opinions. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The PP explained that it was relevant because it showed that the Rockefeller University and Broad Institute had come to an agreement that Rockefeller had no rights to the opposed patent. [read post]