Search for: "Wells v. United States of America" Results 3221 - 3240 of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
It was estimated by The Chronicle of Philanthropy that $246.9 million was raised from donors in the United States in the first month following the disaster. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Well-known components under the Deputy AG include the Office of Solicitor General, the Civil Rights Division, the Civil Division, the Criminal Division, the Anti-Trust Division, the National Security Division, the Tax Division, and the 94 United States Attorney’s Offices. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Rise of Health Care’s Middlemen The United States leads the world in payments to private insurance providers. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm by centerforartlaw
However, this article will focus on intellectual property protection within the United States and provide an outline of what can and cannot be protected. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Well, give it enough time and someone will prove you wrong. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
 Source. ____ Q: Who was issued the first patent issued in North America, and for what? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]