Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
(IPKat)   Germany German Supreme Court widens the door for software patents (ipeg)   Ireland IRMA strongarms mobile ISPs to disconnect file-sharers (TorrentFreak) Eircom users to face Dtecnet scrutiny (1709 Copyright Blog)   Netherlands Publishing locations of pirate movies is the same as hosting them - Movie studio wins lawsuit against Dutch Usenet community (TorrentFreak)   Spain OpenBitTorrent Tracker returns after Hollywood shutdown (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Big Media has… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
Spy planes, like those provided by the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, can be seen buzzing above cities in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
Spy planes, like those provided by the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, can be seen buzzing above cities in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Borderlines Podcast#125 – Chinese Interference, the United Front, and Visa Delays, with Sam Cooper This episode is a historical deep dive on Order in Council PC 1911-1324, an Order in Council from 1911 which stated that for a period of one year black people would not be permitted to immigrate in Canada because the Canadian government deemed them unsuitable to Canada’s climate. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
United States, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes said the legal action against the Schechters violated the Constitution’s Commerce Clause because the chicken business was contained within New York State. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and Chicago, we represent clients of all sizes throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, and throughout the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Now, the United States Court of Appeals has reversed a district court’s dismissal of his free speech claims. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
The jury didn’t buy it, and Elonis was convicted after a trial in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Erin Miller
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
“Forever families” are celebrated when infants and toddlers arrive in the United States, or when infants and children are adopted domestically through private or public agencies. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am by jlucivero
Davis – a challenge to the introduction of explicitly racially biased evidence in a Texas death penalty case – in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm by Pamela Pengelley
With this thought in mind, I turned next to the case law of the United States. b) United States In the United States, there appear to be a number of conflicting decisions in both the liability and insurance coverage contexts regarding the issue of whether the loss of computer data or software can be considered “damage to property. [read post]