Search for: "Box v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Jamie Markham
As stated by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:46 am by Susan Brenner
Lucas produced a box containing rolling papers, marijuana pipes, and marijuana residue . . . but denied there were other drug-related items in the house. . . . [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
In this regard, the Court reasoned as follows:First, jurisprudence suggesting that the mental state of an alleged infringer was irrelevant usually concerned – people who did not know that the goods (containing the infringing sign) that they were selling or otherwise handling were not genuine from the trade mark proprietor rather than those who did not even know that a sign identical or similar to the trade mark existed on the goods at all. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
The language used was that specifically suggested by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States (1935), which upheld good-cause removal protections for Federal Trade Commissioners. [read post]