Search for: "Call v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 55,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear an appeal tomorrow in a case called Lipson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
Union of India, that the situation calls for such action and is thus valid. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Danielle Citron
  Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
The CEO called the Chief and the Other Official once again on October 14 and 15. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
As the court has stated, the applicants and other victim of the so-called tabloid press need to know exactly when and where they [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
As Justice Scalia stated plainly in Grutter, in his view, the "Constitution proscribes government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by war
Playcorp v bodum [54] to [62]). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
CFP: ClassCrits V November 16-17, 2012 CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION ClassCrits V  From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream  Sponsored by University of Wisconsin Law School & The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School  Madison, WI. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
For tax year 2021, Michigan’s personal exemption has increased to $4,900, up from $4,750 in 2020.[6] In New Jersey, A10 was enacted in September 2020, expanding the state’s so-called “millionaire’s tax. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am by Rosalind English
Whilst strict scrutiny is called for in a state’s decision to take a child into care and impose further restrictions on parents’ rights (Elsholz v. [read post]