Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Does the [opponent’s] new argument amount to a new or amended case within the meaning of the RPBA? [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs 1 and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Ken
Also, note that Marc does not specify how any statement I made was false, and does not understand the legally significant difference between statements of opinion and provably true or false statements of fact. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Here are the facts based on this small sample:12/23 (52%): single vehicle accidents3/23 (13%): deaths5/23 (22%): less than 2 weeks of experience in motorcycle operation2/23 (8.7%): between 2 weeks and 1 year of experience in motorcycle operation4/23 (17%): between 16 and 42 years of experience in motorcycle operation6/23 (26%): ages 18-236/23 (26%): ages 24-408/23 (35%): ages 41-603/23 (13%): unknown ages12/23 (52%): had some kind of motorcycle safety… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
A declaration does not have the effect of making primary legislation invalid. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The House Natural Resources Committee is holding a Full Committee markup on the energy portion of the Act today (February 1), [See WIMS 1/30/12, and article below]. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
   As it does every year, the report underscores how rarely the Court grants review. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:36 am by Schachtman
 What does it mean to discover something formally? [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:31 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
, 41 Cornell Q. 6 (1956) (PDF) Hatchett, Joseph W. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by Rick
I read enough civil law to ensure that I’m not missing something which would make me a better criminal defense lawyer, but I have no wish to practice it.1 What I do know is that the world of criminal defense does not — neither in my own experience nor in stories I hear from other criminal defense lawyers — function as my friend believes it does. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:58 am by Daniel Richardson
  Nor does it mean that Defendant has to prove that the State seized it illegally. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:29 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
The UK Supreme Court was established under and in terms of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, section 41(1) of which affirms that “nothing in this …. is to affect the distinctions between the separate legal systems of the parts of the United Kingdom”. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Court found that Article 10 had indeed been violated, and awarded the applicant company EUR 7,602.12 by way of pecuniary damage (just satisfaction, in Article 41 terms) and its costs and expenses. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
It is also important to understand in outline the situation which gave rise to the ruling [41]. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:10 am by Rosalind English
The Court found that Article 10 had indeed been violated, and awarded the applicant company EUR 7,602.12 by way of pecuniary damage (just satisfaction, in Article 41 terms) and its costs and expenses. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:13 am by INFORRM
It is also important to understand in outline the situation which gave rise to the ruling [41]. [read post]