Search for: "FRIDAY v. STATE" Results 3241 - 3260 of 7,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2018, 8:03 am by Amy Howe
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:41 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, the Court called for supplemental briefs on the impact on that case of its decision January 27 in Burrage v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation, on Friday, November 15, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of November 8–14, 2019. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
The conference is next week, on Thursday and Friday, March 27 and 28. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:49 pm by Justin Levitt
  In this context, the low bar also fits the Court’s admonition on Friday that the San Antonio court must defer to Texas’s enacted plans if a preclearance challenge has “no reasonable probability of success” (emphasis mine), and the concerns that it would have if §5 required ignoring Texas’s enacted plan “without any reason to believe those state policies are unlawful” (emphasis again mine). [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, March 14, 2025 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of March 7-13, 2025 Texas is Disrupting Delaware’s Dominance through Innovation Posted by Jonathan Macey (Yale Law School) and Roberta Romano (Yale Law School), on Friday, March 7, 2025 Tags: CEOs, delaware, Delaware law, Shareholders Statement by Acting Chair Uyeda on… [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, March 14, 2025 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of March 7-13, 2025 Texas is Disrupting Delaware’s Dominance through Innovation Posted by Jonathan Macey (Yale Law School) and Roberta Romano (Yale Law School), on Friday, March 7, 2025 Tags: CEOs, delaware, Delaware law, Shareholders Statement by Acting Chair Uyeda on… [read post]
“Appellants have not demonstrated that they will suffer irreparable harm absent a stay,” the panel wrote, citing the US Supreme Court’s stay standard in Nken v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:21 am by Erin Miller
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. (09-834) and on Friday in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]