Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 7,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
OK, perhaps so far so good. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
For doing what you have a critical federal (as well as state) constitutional right to do? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:38 am
State Farm Gen. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The name of the Missouri case is Keeley v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:01 am
The court found that California would follow GNC, because no state court cases have rejected it, but I doubt that given the state’s tradition of consumer protection and its occasional rejection of the Lanham Act analogy ostensibly underneath GNC (occasional because there’s so much California consumer protection law that the analogy is only rarely made).Mullins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:51 am
Ross, the dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California's ban on poorly-housed pork. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
CalSTRS Escalates Efforts to Hold Global Companies Accountable for Not Adequately Disclosing Climate Change Risks Posted by Rebecca Forée, and Aeisha Mastagni, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, on Friday, August 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CalSTRS, Climate change, Proxy season SEC’s New Rules on Use of Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by Hardy Callcott, Jay Baris and Laurie Kleiman, Sidley Austin LLP, on… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
CalSTRS Escalates Efforts to Hold Global Companies Accountable for Not Adequately Disclosing Climate Change Risks Posted by Rebecca Forée, and Aeisha Mastagni, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, on Friday, August 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CalSTRS, Climate change, Proxy season SEC’s New Rules on Use of Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by Hardy Callcott, Jay Baris and Laurie Kleiman, Sidley Austin LLP, on… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
My report on the PI hearing already stated in its headline that Epic was struggling to persuade the court of its likelihood to win.While the TRO was a pre-PI decision, the PI is preliminary to a hypothetical permanent injunction that may or may not come down after the bench trial to be held in Oakland in May 2021. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:52 pm
Ball State decision. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
But as United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,” “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm
Kagan also cited California Democratic Party v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:37 pm
Department of Homeland Security, by Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:44 am
This decision is called Hedlund v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 2:50 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
