Search for: "In re John M"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 8,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
I’m well aware – as a former programmer and as a lawyer who has represented software vendors – that source code is sensitive. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:34 am
It's just out from Johns Hopkins University Press. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:41 pm
But how will we know they’re safe? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
Consider, for instance, John O. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Like most of you, I’m sure, I get momentarily caught whenever I see the word “law” in something I’m reading. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
So if you’re not doing that – acting like a cable system and re-transmitting over-the-air broadcast signals – you can continue to go about your business without worrying about the implications of this decision. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
We’re down to four pretty big cases for decision. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
Roberts, Jr., and by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony M. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John Hoeven (R-ND), John Barrasso (R-WY), and Jim Inhofe (R-OK) today called for a vote on bipartisan legislation to approve the Keystone XL pipeline. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
Even if she had recounted what I wrote precisely correctly, all that vitriol because she’s “not sure” I’m right? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
Dan Tarlock for ISCOTUSnow (video), Richard Re at Re’s Judicata, and Andrew M. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
At 10 a.m., the Justices take the bench, and Chief Justice John G. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am
For a discussion of all the additional restrictions and crimes related to registration, see John Rubin’s excellent publication here. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:37 am
He cites former LexisNexis research scientist, lawyer and computer programmer, John M. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 4:36 am
And we’re just learning about it because it became open in a document yesterday. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:07 pm
Thanks for your patience in waiting for my perspective on the subject — you know I’m thrilled if you know me well, if you know of my involvement in the first successful challenge, or if you’ve read any of my writing here on the topic: “Re-Branding Madness in Washington” Overlooks Obvious: The Washington Redskins Supreme Court Declines to Hear Redskins Trademark Case Trending Now: Washington Redskins Name Change? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:19 am
But I’m hung up on a different point: Why are so many conservatives so married to the idea that detention or military justice is the right answer here? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:50 pm
That's what they're after. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:57 am
As always, there are more than just two to discuss, but we're focusing on these today! [read post]
