Search for: "Interest of Tv" Results 3241 - 3260 of 10,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
It's about protecting the general interest. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:10 pm by Jeff Richardson
  I love taking pictures and videos at an event and then creating a home movie for that event from that media to watch on my iPhone, iPad or Apple TV. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some advocacy groups are more interested in coming close. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Civil rights protestors = self-interest. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Those who settled include TV presenter Davina McCall and actors Rhys Ifans and Nigel Havers. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Jason Snell reviews the Apple TV in an article for Macworld. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:21 am
 Reha Training was concerned with TV broadcasts offered to visitors on premises of a rehabilitation centre. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
As the decision in the case looms in the horizon, it will be interesting to see whether this decision has a big impact on it, and whether the mere provision of hyperlinks would be an intervention that is indispensable for the enjoyment of the works, especially considering the material is freely accessible online to begin with (rather than locked behind a paywall). [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
This time, the inspiration comes from an episode of Hot Bench, which previously gave me the material for Law and Genealogy Meeting In An Interesting Way.The plaintiff bought a car from the defendant, who claimed to be an independent car wholesaler. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:45 pm by Robert Stanley
Again as you can imagine with TV loans, furniture loans, refrigerator loans usually you owe way more than the stuff is worth. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 12:30 pm by David Oxenford
For TV, this has led to the ability of some public interest groups to file complaints for stations allegedly failing to meet some of their political file obligations (see our post here). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As a general proposition, the revival of an old mark, years later, in a slightly different area is an interesting question.In passing, cozi-tv is currently showing the Avengers tv show on broadcast television.http://www.cozitv.com/shows/weekday/The-Avengers-251504981.html [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:53 am by Jim Sedor
‘I Can Watch It on TV’: Excuses for Republicans skipping a Donald TrumpNew York Times – Jeremy Peters | Published: 6/1/2016 Prominent Republicans have announced their intention to skip the party’s national convention in Cleveland this summer, the latest sign that Donald Trump continues to struggle in his effort to unite the party behind his candidacy. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by Ben
 The Tribunale issued an interesting decision on the liability of ISPs for third-party infringing acts, here in the context of proceedings brought by RTI - Reti Televisive Italiane (owned by broadcasting company Mediaset). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:03 am
Further to the submission of these requests, RTI also discovered that nearly 200 channels/TV programs were hosted on Kewego and directly available for viewing there, for an overall length of approx 17h. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:39 pm by Lauren Lynch Flick
  Because these exempt stations are permitted to transition early, the demonstration should be of interest to all radio station licensees. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:31 am
That is probably the reason why I developed a personal interest in the protection of the function and design of products during my law studies. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by NCC Staff
Kennedy Philly’s conventions: Civil rights, TV, heat dominate 1948 meetings [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:43 am by Duets Guest Blogger
So: If Paramount and/or CBS can claim ownership of Okrand’s work-for-hire on the TV shows, the movies, and the dictionary, what about the neologisms not created by Okrand? [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:20 am
 Readers may remember that in its 2013 TV Catchup decision [here] the Court rejected TV Catchup’s contention that for Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive to apply the communication must be directed to a ‘new public’. [read post]