Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 39,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 12:51 pm
A little unusual. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Ho-hum.It's nonetheless a little unusual in a couple of ways. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
So when the trial court suggested that the husband ask his wife questions on direct -- after the two had decided to represent themselves -- rather than having the wife do so herself, yeah, that's a little strange, and potentially improper.At the same time, I totally understand Judge Nguyen's point as well. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
I would have thought that "criminal property damage in the first degree" was a lot less dangerous than arson, extortion or explosives.Just goes to show you potentially how little I know. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:17 pm
Ever.But what very little I do know seems entirely consistent with Justice Liu's opinion today. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
Judge Clifton begins the thing with a nice little summary:"It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
Look for very little (if any) money for the actual class. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:03 pm
Prior Ninth Circuit precedent on the point is a little unclear and contradictory. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:38 pm
One great thing about Court of Appeal opinions is that they sometimes give you a real-world glimpse into portions of society that you'd otherwise know little about. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
Fortunately, all that happened was that appellant was arrested and placed on probation.It's also a neat little appeal because it's one that's basically based on a law review article: Northrop & Rosen's piece entitled “Kids Will be Kids: Time for a ‘Reasonable Child’ Standard for the Proof of Objective Mens Rea Elements. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:57 pm
"(2) In the majority opinion, the sly little joke from Judge McKeown: "Admittedly, the validity of the Proclamation—an Antiquities Act order that implicates the O&C Act—presents a statutory thicket. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:58 pm
(The opinion is a little confusing in places because it talks about the defendant having killed "Darrington" -- meaning David Darrington -- even though the defendant's wife was also a Darrington: Traci Darrington.)You can understand why you might stab and kill your wife's ex-husband for reasons beyond those that might arise from being evicted.So maybe the lesson here is: Be careful if you're trying to evict your ex-wife and her current… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:18 pm
And after pleading guilty (after some adverse pretrial rulings from the district court), Roger is sentenced to five years in prison and Sherryanne, his "assistant manager" (and eventual wife), receives a little over two years.The Ninth Circuit affirms. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
Disagreeing with Justice Rylaarsdam, and holding that appointed counsel should continue to file such briefs.Justice Aronson articulates his reasons for that conclusion a little differently than I did. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
He'd been on the Ninth Circuit for a little over a decade, and decided it was time to move on. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:53 pm
Since they didn't publish anything today either.But at least the California Court of Appeal did a little work.Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeal holds that, yes, it may well be deceptive for Skype to advertise that it offers "unlimited" calls to the U.S. and Canada (as well as elsewhere) when, in fact, these services are manifestly limited to six hours a day, fifty numbers per day, ten thousand minutes a month, etc.I'm fairly surprised that the trial court held otherwise. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
But isn't there something a little lame about attaching the district court's opinion as a Westlaw printout? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
It might be useful for the courts (or the Judicial Council) to actually spend some time and come up with a neat little "cheat sheet" that trial court judges can use for waivers like this. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:51 pm
Litigation that resulted in a trip to the California Supreme Court, multiple rounds in the Court of Appeal, and so much work in the probate court that I can't even fathom it all.All from a simple little trust. [read post]
