Search for: "Matter of Novel"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 7,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
In our new research, Do Director Elections Matter? [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:51 am
And, of course, the way to deal with such a situation is by spending, collectively, a few hundred thousand dollars disputing ownership of the patent application firstly in a state Supreme Court and then before a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia.The only way this could all be a bigger waste of money and effort would be if the patent application in question was directed to some kind of unpatentable subject matter, such as a method of wagering on a card game, for example. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:21 pm
Sophie LawranceIntroduction On a number of occasions the Court of Justice (CJEU) has been tasked with deciding how familiar concepts of competition law apply to novel facts. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:34 am
The CFPB claimed that the defendants’ effort to collect amounts in excess of the amounts lawfully due under state law was “unfair,” “deceptive” and “abusive” under the CFPA as a matter of federal law. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
The details of a regulatory budget matter greatly. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 7:10 am
Ct. 2347 (2014) to the novel claims of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:52 am
In short, privacy from whom matters, and an understanding of privacy as a contextual value is really important to explaining the lived privacy choices of real people. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
Decision G 1/03 therefore does not apply.4.5 The first auxiliary request is thus not allowable, because the subject-matter of claim 1 extends beyond the content of the application as filed, contrary to Article 123(2) EPC.(...)7.2 The board thus concludes that the claims of the third auxiliary request are novel.8. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 2:52 pm
The PTAB instituted CBM review of the ’752 patent on several grounds, including invalidity for unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 10:40 am
As a graphic/experience designer I thrive on the mix of left and right brain approaches to solving novel challenges. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
The White House and the cabinet are charged with immensely consequential decisions; not infrequently, they determine matters of life and death. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
No matter how thoughtful an agency’s promulgation of a rule may be, there will always be potential for improvements. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:19 pm
The presumption of innocence should not be a novel concept for our elected representatives to grasp. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:24 am
According to Politico, these threat represent “a novel form of party message discipline. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
Using these data allows our attorneys to learn from our clients’ needs and help develop new and novel solutions to their problems. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Of the "drug patent" matter discussed in medcitynews, the recent flurry of excitement in the MS community over the drug Ocrelizumab brings up another issue [that of two competing drugs for a single condition, with one offered at a significantly cheaper price. ]As background to Ocrelizumab, see the post in managedcare magazine Finally, Attention Switches To Progressive Multiple Sclerosis includingOcrelizumab is novel and achieved its breakthrough designation because… [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 1:25 am
After it has been established that an alleged invention lies in a field of patent-eligible subject matter, and is novel (i.e. not already known in the same form) determining whether it constitutes a sufficient advance to be worthy of a state-sanctioned exclusive property right is wholly the work of the law of inventive step.This is important work. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
As we close out the year, we pause to review important developments in agricultural law from 2016. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
As we close out the year, we pause to review important developments in agricultural law from 2016. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
The relevant law here is section 31G(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (inserted in 2014 when the Family Court was created but drawn from earlier legislation), which says : Where in any proceedings in the family court it appears to the court that any party to the proceedings who is not legally represented is unable to examine or cross-examine a witness effectively, the court is to— (a) ascertain from that party the matters about which the… [read post]
