Search for: "Persons v. Jones" Results 3241 - 3260 of 3,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Comstock, which upheld Congress’s power to provide for the civil commitment of sexually dangerous persons after the completion of their prison sentences, the Chief Justice joined in full in the left’s broad interpretation of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause; Kenne [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Data privacy and data protection 560 million Ticketmaster customers may have had their personal data stolen after the company’s database was targeted by hacking group, ShinyHunters, who claimed responsibility for the attack. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The ICO’s website had a blog post that it has issued two reprimands, which are legal warnings, to schools for wrongly disclosing the personal data of children in the form of pictures. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Parliament has determined that such an order should expire when the young person reaches the age of 18. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” Randall Scott Jones v. [read post]