Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:50 pm
Texas, which raises a major question about the limits of executive power. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:06 am
People's United Bank, NA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on April 17, 1889. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:55 am
Police Power Enlarged by Court The Indiana Supreme Court ruled in Barnes v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Bus. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:02 am
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:50 am
Power, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Appellate Courts differ regarding the State’s reduction of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums for certain State retireesBransten v State of New York, 117 AD3d 455 Retired Pub. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:05 am
In Tingley v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Cops have extraordinary power in our overly-policed state, that stands in sharp contract to the ideal of our living in a free society in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Northern States Power Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:24 am
Lujan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The American Journal of Legal History 62: 3 (September 2022) is now entirely available online:Class, Conservation, and the Police Power in the American Gilded Age: The Origins of Lawton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
The US Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision today in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:34 am
An interesting state law decision today from the New Hampshire Supreme Court in Bach v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
In agreeing to hear state officials’ appeals in Lafler v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
