Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States 11-9335Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:42 am
Raymond Randolph and Harry T. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 10:26 am
The purpose of a separate statement of undisputed facts is to Provide the court with a document that plainly and concisely specifies all material facts that are claimed to be undisputed (CCP §437c(b)(1)); Provide the court with clear reference to evidence supporting each material fact (Cal Rules of Ct 3.1350); and Afford due process to opposing parties (State ex rel Harris v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2005) 125 CA4th 1219, 1262 n28, 23 CR3d 529,… [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:42 pm
In Kinlaw v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:13 am
Foreclosure News – The 3rd District Court of Appeal in Florida issued an opinion (Deutsche Bank Trust v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:48 pm
In a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Florida v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
Take for example the spinal plate at issue in Harris v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
"Here's an analysis from last year I hadn't seen by Alycia Welch at the UT-Austin LBJ School titled, "Harris County Sheriff's Office Management Failures: Inadequate Medical Care at the Harris County Jail. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
At Greenwire (subscription required), Ellen Gilmer reports that in Kisor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Harris) is the only evidence that is sufficient to overcome conflicting version of events. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am
Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:24 am
All of this comes about because the court has recently begun to ponder what to do with the case titled Harris v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In 2014, the Court held in Harris v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
Md.) in Foldi v. [read post]
