Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Apr 2025, 3:31 pm
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Davis L. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
In Béland , supra , McIntyre J., speaking about the inadmissibility of a polygraph test, cited at p. 415 Davie v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Supreme Court has explained that statements made in response to police inquiries are not testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency (Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]; Davis v Washington, 126 S Ct 2266 [2006]). [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
Davis, 195 Misc.2d 858 (Rochester Cty Ct. 2003); People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
Davis, which will also be argued next week, “the case of Texas death row inmate Duane E. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
The myth of the superuser: fear, risk, and harm online. 41 UC Davis L. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
" Picking up on the "primary purpose" language of Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Kenneth Davis and Jennifer Davis (NFP), a 13-page 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Here, the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the attorney's fee issue, and there is no indication that it considered the parties' resources, economic condition, or other factors that would bear on the reasonableness of the award of attorney's fees. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
On Wednesday 11 December 2024 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Nicola Davies and Dingemans LJJ) will hand down judgment in the important misuse of private information “representative action” case of Prismall v Google. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
