Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 3241 - 3260 of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by azatty
United States, the case that had upheld the federal government’s exclusion and internment of United States citizens. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:13 pm
Raich is hard to reconcile with United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  This “Equal Access” provision is a pillar of Medicaid, and it has been a source of litigation against states that pay providers too little. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Tushnet
a gay rights doctrine (even though, as Carpenter points out, there are predecessors in United States v Moreno and Cleburne). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am by Steve Statsinger
United States, No. 10-371-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
United States Bank Nat’l Assoc., 479 F.3d 994, 999 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
  You can, if you are interested, read more about the United States’ Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the Wikipedia entry you can find here.Guillotte made two arguments on appeal and the Court of Appeals addressed then in what seems to have been the order in which he articulated them. [read post]