Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
“[V]isitors to [defendant’s] Internet homepage were able to click a link [to purchase defendant’s product] . . . and then select ‘United States’ and ‘Delaware’ from separate drop-down menus. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Public Deserves to See Secret Law Written by Office of Legal Counsel Washington, DC - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today asked the Supreme Court of the United States to weigh in on a long-standing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in which EFF sought to obtain a secret legal memo authorizing the FBI to obtain phone records without any legal process. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:45 am
In fact, Denmark and the United States are the only countries in the world to set a specific monetary limit on the debt. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am
However … [it] has not used the mark in any meaningful way anywhere… [and] the record is devoid of evidence that would create a genuine issue of material fact that [it] uses the mark CASINO DE MONACO to identify its services, anywhere, but particularly in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
In the United States the protection of three-dimensional marks falls under trade dress (defined in 15 USC 1127), and is more mailable than legislation applying purely to registered trademarks. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
” NECA “is a leading provider of collectible figures, games and game equipment in the United States and abroad. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
by: Mark A. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:40 am
In this long-running cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark COHIBA for cigars, the Board considered "the means available to cross-examine a declarant or affiant testimonial witness outside the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Brice Petrides-Donahue & Associates, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 612, 619 (Iowa 1991) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Missouri:[P]unitive damages are remedial and a plaintiff has no vested right to such damages prior to the entry of judgment. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Brice Petrides-Donahue & Associates, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 612, 619 (Iowa 1991) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Missouri:[P]unitive damages are remedial and a plaintiff has no vested right to such damages prior to the entry of judgment. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 12:10 am
That's the Ford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
In Stauffer v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am
Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am
United States, concluding that “this result doesn’t represent some new watershed in white collar crime or dramatic expansion of federal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
