Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3241 - 3260 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am by Cori Crider
 A gulf has opened between the CIA’s position on treatment of prisoners and the moral and legal view of every democratic ally of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm by lennyesq
Virginia, which struck down anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
  The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The early dismissal would be final as to that claim, see United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am by Ilya Somin
United States, which struck down a statute requiring state officials to help enforce a federal gun control law) and it cannot do it circuitously, as with Section 1373. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can generally benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines, “marks another episode in the continuing saga about how to treat the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” and that “[b]y failing to explain what ‘advisory’ Guidelines actually are, and by making inconsistent statements about the role of the Guidelines at sentencing, the Court has left… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]