Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
For example, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:36 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
O’Hara v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am
’” While the OLC opinion binds the executive branch, it’s not law, and the courts still get to decide for realsies. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
" Eventually, in SFFA v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:23 pm
As the Court noted in Lewis v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am
In determining a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court is concerned with only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
9 May 2010, 5:55 pm
In Munson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am
Serrone v Southbridge Towers, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
” Feds for Medical Freedom et al., v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:41 am
By a vote of 6-3, the majority concluded that the legal challenge in Trump v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
To file papers with the state. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:56 am
After all, in Eastern Enterprises v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:04 am
(Train v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:22 pm
Roe and Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:59 am
-M. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
Christopher may revisit the problematic case of Auer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:53 am
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit,” on Code Revision Commission v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the cause of action alleging legal malpractice (see Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d at 837; Ofman v Katz, 89 AD3d 909, 910; Thompsen v Baier, 84 AD3d 1062, 1063). [read post]
