Search for: "House v. State" Results 3261 - 3280 of 25,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
”  The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court says, "The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, predicting that, under the circumstances presented, the Arkansas Supreme Court would not recognize a cause of action against a third party for attorney's fees incurred in separate litigation. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
The Speaker represents the entire body of the House of Representatives — Democratic and Republican — in the State of the Union. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
This guidance states: “8.26. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
And only one other state has any role for the state House of Representatives in selecting governors. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York Court of Appeals has held that a housing complex that threatened litigation against a "tester" organization that accused it of housing discrimination can be liable under the state law that prohibits retaliation for asserting discrimination claims.The case is Clifton Park Apartments v. [read post]