Search for: "IN RE T A G" Results 3261 - 3280 of 7,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Maintenant âgée de 43 ans, cette dernière vit avec un conjoint et est mère de 2 enfants âgés respectivement de 6 et 7 ans. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
And people buy it to inject into their faces so that (they think) we won’t think they’re as old as they really are. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:32 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If it goes to moderation because, for example, you’re new here, the time stamp on your comment is what counts. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 1:14 am
Pour la première, le moment déterminant est la fin générale des opérations militaires, pour laquelle la thèse propose des indicateurs, tandis que pour la seconde ce moment peut intervenir plus tôt, (rapatriements des prisonniers de guerre, collecte des restes explosifs de guerre…), ou plus tard (occupation, personnes détenues…). [read post]
”  This assumption presumes that all native advertising is equal under the eyes of the law, and we come to the conclusion that it probably isn’t. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 4:01 am by Administrator
Le requérant désire être autorisé à exercer un recours collectif au nom des personnes ayant subi des dommages relativement au débordement de la rivière Richelieu et qui n’ont pas été indemnisées ou qui ne l’ont été que partiellement. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:33 pm by Lucy Reed
For those of you who wish to compare some of the judgments that appear to be referred to or drawn heavily upon in The Children Act, take a look at Re G (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1233 (04 October 2012) and Re A (Children) [2000] EWCA Civ 254 (22 September 2000), a decision of a Court of Appeal comprising Brooke LJ, Walker LJ and Ward LJ, whose anecdote and guidance has clearly been so influential on this book. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:48 pm by Wells Bennett
As we noted earlier today, documents bearing on the In Re Directives litigation have now been declassified. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le paragraphe 32(1) porte sur une seule question, la pollution, et une seule infraction générique a été imputée, en essence «la pollution». [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
 If you've got 8 challenges left and let 7 Hispanics on the jury, that's some evidence -- and remember that we're in deferential AEDPA land -- that the prosecutor was not, in fact, discriminating based on race.I can't help but wonder what really went down here. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Another line:My g-spot has been declared a historical landmark. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:17 am by admin
Of the pedestrians involved, 33% had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of greater than or equal to .08 grams per deciliter (g/dL). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:50 am by SHG
And in a 2013 decision, Justice Stephen G. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 9:42 am by Administrator
Décision Les critères applicables à la recevabilité des rapports d’expert ont été énoncés dans R. c. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
Usually when we’re deciding whether to grant summary judgment for the police in deadly force cases we must wade through the “factbound morass of ‘reasonableness. [read post]