Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 3261 - 3280
of 62,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 1:00 am
Road Accident Fund v Taylor and other matters [2023] ZASCA 64 (8 May 2023) [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:50 am
Moreover, you're worried. [read post]
9 May 2023, 11:11 am
During the main summation and rebuttal of United States v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:00 am
Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Mafate [2023] ZASCA 14 (17 February 2023) [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:52 am
The recently circulated Re St. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:44 pm
NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES 14, L.P .v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm
Jaberi, R (On the Application Of) v City of Westminster (Re Housing Act 1996) (2023) EWHC 1045 (Admin) A judicial review on three grounds: i) Breach of section 193(2) Housing Act 1996 duty to secure suitable accommodation; ii) The Westminster’s allocation policy was unlawful in that it denied the applicant medical need priority reasonable preference, restricting him to homeless reasonable preference; and iii) Breach of the duty under section 166A(9)(a)(ii) Housing Act 1996 to… [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
According to some courts, they’re also unenforceable. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
In Zelouf Int’l Corp. v Zelouf, best known and most often cited for applying a 0% marketability discount in its fair value determination, is the most interesting of the three cases that decided the interest rate. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 2:37 pm
Andrew Kuhaiki, Petitioner, v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 4:00 am
L’application de la Loi sur la sécurité privée à l’intimée ne cause pas de véritable entrave. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
They're simply about maximizing the value of the sales leads IPlytics' salespersons can then follow up on. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:49 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
