Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 29,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 5:41 am
Moreover, as will be seen below, the word “authorize” is used in one sense in the United States, in another very different sense in the international treaties and the EU, and in yet a third very different sense in the Commonwealth countries (wherein the term has yielded conflicting results at the highest judicial level).The brief looked at the state of the law in early 2005 on "secondary liability" and "authorization" in the USA, UK, Canada… [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:13 am
QSI's are awards given for sustained performance of high quality that significantly exceeds an acceptable level of competence. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:55 pm
The solution is to reforge values at the state and local level while keeping the pathways (e.g., access to contraception) open through national efforts. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
The Court had heard argument in Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:37 am
Where, as we speak, wedding bells toll across the State. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
Each State stands on the same level with all the rest…. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In that decision (Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
(Here's my April 2010 post on Hoang v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Equal pay for equal workBertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227; Motion to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 706; Motion to appeal on constitutional grounds denied, 95 NY2d 958Section 115 of the Civil Service Law provides that State employees are entitled to equal pay for equal work, and regular increases in pay in proper proportion to increase of ability, increase of output and increase of equality of work demonstrated in service.While Section 115 applies only to employees of the… [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:50 am
Just three days ago, I noted United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:11 am
In Ma v University of Toronto, an employee’s application was allowed to continue, whereas in Sikorski v Vaughan (City), the employee’s application was dismissed. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
If you read a case called Ibrahim v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:36 am
" United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:57 pm
There is a serious problem with that analysis: the California Supreme Court held in Adams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]
