Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 3261 - 3280 of 4,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
’  Even as it revitalized judicial enforcement of the Tenth Amendment in cases such as New York and Printz, the Court treated spending as an exception by stating that the federal government could basically buy state cooperation without running afoul of the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Yet six of the twelve pre-Constitution state copyright acts — Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, and South Carolina — explicitly gave the author of a work “the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, and vending” that work, suggesting that protection of copyright was compatible with the goals of a free press. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  ALLEN WOLFSON, Plaintiff, -against- CHRISTOPHER BRUNO, Defendant;  08 Civ. 0481 (AJP); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
This Court’s clarification of whether human health is the new actionable threshold for contamination and final resolution as to the corr-ect meaning of “non-natural” use is required to provide landowners, regulators and industrial actors across Canada with certainty around their 1 St Lawrence Cement Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room focuses on Justice Kagan’s recusal from the case, while several journalists – including Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and Nina Totenberg of NPR — focused on the case’s potential effect on the upcoming presidential election, particularly when combined with the Court’s expected rulings on the health care and Texas… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  Nevertheless, the Rehnquist Court reiterated that the Spending Clause is not limited by the Tenth Amendment in New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by Richard D. Friedman
On Tuesday, I attended argument of Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Aaron Tang
Roberts – is the correct approach? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Conor McEvily
Joe Forward of the State Bar of Wisconsin examines the effect that the Court’s decisions in Miller v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:24 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
New York), it’s a safe bet the Roberts Court will be telling us more about the FCA soon. [read post]