Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 3261 - 3280 of 11,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
As noted earlier, the Moore Court said that while “ordinary” judicial review by state courts poses no federal constitutional problems, state courts do not enjoy “free rein. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Most state courts have done the same, with a few exceptions. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:10 pm
In its order certifying the class, the court stated that it was not ruling on the effect of the principles set forth in the Daugherty case. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:03 pm by Robin Mashal
"The materials for this article were obtained from various sources including Yahoo News, Wikipedia, Washington State Bar Association, Cornell University Law School, and About.com. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
But it’s hard for us to see how a federal court would prevent a state legislature from enacting a revision to the adopted plan or bar the governor from signing the revision into law. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 2:30 pm by Sophia Cope
That's why this case is critical—victims of powerful, increasingly-common surveillance technologies like Pegasus spyware must not be barred from U.S. courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:05 pm by Amanda Frost
Even as the Supreme Court bar has been expanding, the Supreme Court press corps has shrunk rapidly as newspapers have reduced their staffs. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
Illinois, an 1872 case involving a female lawyer who was twice denied admission to the Illinois bar. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm by Neil Rosenbaum
The court pointed to material conflicts between the consumer protection laws of California and other states (such as a scienter requirement of some state consumer protection laws but not others). [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:13 pm by webmaster
Section 1194 precluded recovery as to both state and federal overtime claims; Section 226 allowed fee awards to employees only; and California’s unfair competition law categorically does not authorize attorney fee awards. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  In a prior blog post, we discussed the Nalwa decision, a 2013 California Supreme Court ruling finding a claim for an injury sustained aboard a bumper car ride was barred because the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury when she chose to board the ride and that the risk of a minor injury was inherent in the ride. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal’s CEQA Analysis Reviewing the order sustaining the demurrer de novo, and assuming the truth of all well-pleaded and properly judicially noticed facts (though not mere contentions, deductions, and conclusions of law), the Court of Appeal held the trial court properly dismissed the CEQA claim as barred by CEQA’s maximum 180-day limitations period, such that it did not need to reach the issue whether the claim was also barred… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    California law guarantees lunch breaks for hourly workers in California. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]