Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 11,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 11:12 am
S. 570, 586 (2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The judicial capacity model also explains why the justices have pursued their ideological goals through a fairly rigid framework of tiered scrutiny that clearly marks off various narrow categories of government action for serious review, while subjecting all others to essentially categorical deference. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
In 1998, the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intellectual Property Prematurely Cancelled Mark Restored to Owner Of Pizzeria That Had Used the Mark Since 1933 Patsy's Italian Restaurant Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Texas, supra, 539 U.S. 577. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:19 am
U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S.437 (2007); see also Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Vaver, Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patents, Trade-marks (2nd ed. 2011), at p. 182. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:45 pm
Lee v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:45 pm
Lee v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:09 am
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
USA: Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
They also alleged that U.S. taxpayers had funded KBR’s contracts and the racketeering enterprise had passed money through the U.S. banking system. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009). [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:00 pm
See Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
* Have U.S. courts made patents less valuable? [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
The case is titled Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
