Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 3261 - 3280 of 29,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Larry Bodine
’ I’ve looked over the horizon and seen the future of legal marketing: it is online video. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:16 am by Eleonora Rosati
Code § 103).While AI has undeniably contributed to significant technological advancements, the current legal framework does not explicitly address whether AI can be considered a PHOSITA (Thales Visionix Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 3:26 pm by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
SEC CHARGES HEAD OF FIRST CAPITAL REAL ESTATE TRUST INC. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 2:10 pm by Tom Lamb
We are doing this review because it was during April 2013 that Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. took these actions: Sent a so-called "Dear Doctor" letter in Canada (but not the US) warning about some serious side effects associated with Tasigna; and, Issued a Tasigna drug label change in Canada (but not the US) with new information concerning those Tasigna side effects. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:53 am
We've blogged about international legal language translation services in the content of trademark protection and the trademark applicants' bona fide intent to use. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 10:55 am by Julie L. Spieker
Taco Bell asserted that Taco Tuesday is a common phrase that the public should be able to freely use without the possibility of legal action. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Illumina, Inc. and Sequenom, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2011) and builds upon the parallel doctrine of legal estoppel discussed in AMP Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Those legal rights are not as extensive as equivalent rights enjoyed in other places, like the European Union. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:53 am
In re InfoSecurity Infrastructure, Inc., Serial No. 88013497 (May 28, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 1:03 am by Jon Gelman
The False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar does not prevent a water purification specialist's lawsuit accusing Halliburton Co and KBR Inc of violating contractual duties to test and purify lavatory and drinking water used by U.S. troops in Iraq, a federal court in Virginia ruled on Thursday. [read post]