Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 3281 - 3300 of 107,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 9:00 am by Soha and Lang
  The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer.The Court of Appeals affirmed and held that the insurer had no duty to indemnify. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:10 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down the long awaited en banc decision on In re Bilski (07-1130) in which the court looked at the question of when does a claim that contains both mental and physical steps create patent-eligible subject matter and whether a method or process must result in a physical transformation of an article or be tied to a machine to be patent-eligible subject matter under section 101. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The Board of Appeal’s decision BVG’s appeal was dismissed (case R2220-2023-5). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
Therefore, it does not appear that the punitive damages awards in Hardeman and Johnson sufficed to ‘punish and deter’ Monsanto’s conduct. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:19 am by James Hamilton
The rule does not apply if applicable state law or a company’s governing documents prohibit shareholders from nominating a candidate for election as a director. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:29 am by David Russcol
Sometimes a defendant did not get notice of a show cause hearing – which happens frequently when people move and the court does not have the right address. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am by Record on Appeal
Patterson, No. 09-0378 (Nov. 5, 2010), in which the court originally held 6-2 (with Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson recused) that Texas does not recognize a "rolling" public beachfront access easement, without proof of prescription (on certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
Global Patent Holdings, represented by Niro Scavone, lost an appeal at the CAFC.Elsewhere, in the stent wars, Cordis Corporation ("Cordis") appeals, and Boston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am by Alex Phipps
However, in the written order denying the motion, the trial court included a conclusion of law that “Rule 60(b)(6) does not apply because extraordinary circumstances do not exist. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 10:35 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The law, however, does allow insurers to exclude coverage for injuries that occur in uninsured vehicles owned by its insured. [read post]