Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 3281 - 3300 of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Kevin F. Brady
” Adequacy When evaluating a lead plaintiff’s adequacy, courts generally accord the greatest weight to the presence or absence of conflicts of interest or economic antagonism. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Bridgestone Corp., Criminal No. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:12 am
Compare In re Gibson Guitar Corp., 61 USPQ2d 1948 (TTAB 2001) [Applicant failed to meet its high evidentiary burden where its guitar configuration was extremely similar to those used by other guitar manufacturers]. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
As to related litigation, Apple states that the ‘949 patent is currently being litigated against High Tech Computer Corp. and others in the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
AMVAC Chemical Corp., 2008 WL 4691004, at *5 (C.D.Cal. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:20 pm
 Take the case of Apple Corps Ltd., the holding company that owns the Beatles’ record label, and Apple, Inc., the computer company. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 5:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The real point of expert testimony in cases like Lobel’s and General Nutrition Corp. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am by admin
”  Judge Beaudrot held that Georgia Power’s manufacturing of electricity is the production of electrical energy, which “begins and ends” at Georgia Power’s generating plants. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am by admin
”  Judge Beaudrot held that Georgia Power’s manufacturing of electricity is the production of electrical energy, which “begins and ends” at Georgia Power’s generating plants. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
And New York courts have generally narrowly construed the statute as applying only to commercial advertising, to avoid conflicts with the First Amend­ment. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent… [read post]