Search for: "In re Miller" Results 3281 - 3300 of 3,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2008, 2:18 am
  Did I mention that the Race Director Jane Miller is The Best? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
(Class 99) GRAIN MILLERS go for ruling on ‘more than local significance’ use: Grain Millers, Inc. v OHIM (Class 46) France Fraudulent trade mark filing (Class 46) Germany Camtek files suit in German Federal Court alleging Rudolph’s edge inspection equipment infringes its patent (IP Factor) India Guzaarish in copyright controversy (Spicy IP) Preparing for the patent agent exam (Spicy IP) Bachhan lodges protest not in sotto voce, but in Customary Baritone (Spicy IP)… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by John McFarland
This commission, the Bourland and Miller Commission, began its work in 1850 and finished in 1852. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
Notably, the two-justice majority did not even acknowledge that Ninth Circuit precedent existed addressing the very issue of whether claims adjusters are exempt (Miller v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Bill Marler
Miller Fisher Syndrome (MFS) is a related neurological syndrome that can occur with a Campylobacter infection. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Seán Binder
Greg Miller and Isabelle Khurshudyan report for the Washington Post. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
“You’re saying the special counsel is taking inconsistent positions, but aren’t you just doing the same thing, flip-flopped? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:20 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department is in touch with three Americans who were detained by Israel last month, Miller confirmed. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am by MBettman
“So could an employer say to an at-will employee, that you have to supply a urine sample in the center of the workplace with everyone watching? [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
Miller's gut feeling is that false positives are worse (in patent) than false negatives. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed August 19, 2021, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court that found fault with the EIR for an improvement project within the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument portion of the Angeles National Forest. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
On November 7, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion mostly upholding the EIR for a 48.75-acre, 328-unit residential infill project (known as McKinley Village) against various CEQA challenges, and finding the Project to be consistent with the City of Sacramento’s general plan. [read post]