Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 3281 - 3300 of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997)(quoting United States Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, even as it belatedly repudiated that awful precedent. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
”[xix] Moreover, two of the seven judges of the ECHR dissented in the opinion stating that “[t]he Court does not have valid reasons to foresee with any degree of certainty that Colombia would fail to comply with its obligations arising from international law. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
South Africa, England), this does not appear to apply for the chrysotile industry in North America. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
 Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat)   United States… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
It doesn’t change the fact that they are in the United States in violation of federal immigration law. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Slave Routes points out, In the United States, the North America historian, Herbert Aptheker, has estimated that approximately 250 acts of sedition in all were organized by Afro-Americans to free themselves from slavery during the history of that “particular institution” in that country. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
" The League is led by James Fotis, who for many years oversaw an NRA-supported effort to elect judges and state attorneys general who opposed firearms restrictions. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Poniatowska v Channel Seven Sydney [2019] SASCFC 111, the full Court allowed the plaintiff’s appeal against the Judge’s dismissal of her defamation action and entered judgment of damages to be assessed. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
United States (1935), which until recently limited this sort of thing. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]