Search for: "People v. Manning" Results 3281 - 3300 of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:43 am by Adam Wagner
Mr Condliff’s local Primary Care Trust (PCT) only provides the expensive gastric bypass surgery routinely to people with a BMI over 50. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 8:06 am by familoo
Are we surprised to find that 6% of people with money to burn on divorce lawyers have a pony? [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:10 am by Kate Ruane
We saw the result last year, when Detroit police arrested a Black man, Robert Williams, because a face recognition tool had returned a false match. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state cannot allow non-religious people to follow their consciences but strictly enforce the law against religious people. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am by Guest Blogger
  While equality is expanding for LGBT people, it is evaporating for people of color.Robinson’s critique exposes the uneasy connection between the increased willingness to confess prejudice against sexual minorities and the increasingly urgent claim that racism and sexism are “over”:[The animus doctrine] reflects one man’s intuition that people of color and women have obtained enough justice in the courts, and the focus of modern equal… [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
We're not told of anything friendly and accommodating Harris said or did, but why not aim vague attacks at people who are not present — "a man in her position" — and, earlier — "the media, and Americans more generally"? [read post]