Search for: "People v. New" Results 3281 - 3300 of 41,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The application, Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am by Schachtman
  Over 60,000 new cases are diagnosed annually, in people from all walks of life, occupations, and lifestyles. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” As The New Yorker pointed out in an article summarizing the decision and its implications: The story told in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:53 am by Jeremy Saland
In People v, Fredericks, 2017 NY Slip Op 50091 (New York Criminal Court 2017), The accused was observed holding money and rolling dice in the street while six other people exchanged money. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In Muwema v Facebook Ireland Ltd (No 2) [2017] IEHC 69 (08 February 2017), Binchy J allowed the new evidence to be introduced; and, having considered it, he declined to make the order after all. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:40 am by On the Net
In Part V, I conclude with a “realist” assessment of likelihood that the Supreme Court will actually find the mandate to be unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
US Law and Media News It is reported that a study in the United States has found that young people care about privacy just as much as older people but behave more recklessly online because they think the law gives them more protection than it actually does. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The question for the ET was whether it is reasonably necessary in order to achieve the legitimate aims of the scheme to deny those benefits to people in the applicant’s position. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]