Search for: "People v. White"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 6,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
There was a confidence on the part of the administration and the White House that once people became aware of this, there would be a change. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
And, for that matter, if the Republicans controlled the Senate, and Ted Cruz were President pro tem, would not some people be skeptical about his presiding over Trump’s trial, given the very real possibility that he, like Democrats, could be a Trump rival for the White House in 2024 if Trump is not disqualified after an impeachment conviction? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
From New York trial judge Shlomo Hagler's opinion released today in Gu v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
ShareIn 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:37 am
Very often, the discussion is centered about the impact that Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:01 am
Lawyers help people access their rights and entitlements within the legal system. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:06 am
In 2006, in a case styled Kansas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
Section 44 was abandoned in July of this year after the European Court of Human Rights refused an appeal its decision in Gillan & Quinton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
That case is Gordon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:51 am
Houser v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm
Here is the abstract: Concurring in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 11:12 am
After the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:13 pm
District Court Judge Joseph Tauro in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Here is how the THRWU explains its outlook… Susan on the SoapboxMouseland (why do people vote against their self-interest?) [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 5:29 pm
Wade: "I think we should eliminate the filibuster for Roe [v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
Thanks to Ben Snyder for the pointer.UPDATE: Forgot to mention — the less unusual restriction (in the last paragraph) on “assemblies or demonstrations” in BART stations is also constitutional, see ISKCON v. [read post]
