Search for: "R. D. C." Results 3281 - 3300 of 20,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 11:33 pm
Viñuales (Univ. of Cambridge), La responsabilité aggravée en droit international contemporain Wenqi Zhu (Renmin Univ. of China), Safeguarding the Defence – Proceedings Before International Criminal Justice Private International LawAlexis Mourre (Cour internationale d’arbitrage de la CCI), Conférence inaugurale : La légitimité de l’arbitrage Linda Silberman (New York Univ.), General Course: The Counter-Revolution in Private… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:36 pm by Mark Weidemaier
(Does sub-section A of clause B permit outcome C under circumstances D, E, etc…?) [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Superior Court Ruling As discussed here, in March 2017, Judge William C. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
The Canadian copyright review conducted earlier this year heard evidence on a remarkably broad range of issues. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 3:58 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Motard c. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:06 am by Tobias Lutzi
Recognition can only be refused on the grounds set forth in Article 45(1) Brussels Ibis Regulation, and unlike Article 7(1)(d) of the recently adopted HCCH Judgments Convention, none of them covers this scenario. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
(…)’ II.4.c) Assessment of compatibility with Union law, in particular with CJEU Opinion 1/09? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also clear that it is not akin to detailed assessment, which was where NHG was headed… And the suggestion that an EPA is something routinely done by a grade D paralegal fee earner under the supervision of a grade C solicitor is, shall we say, one of those bad points taken on detailed assessment that doesn’t succeed (but then the Admin court doesn’t do costs assessment). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
(c) Any employer who violates this section shall be guilty of criminal contempt, and, upon conviction thereof, may be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days, or both. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La Chambre rappelle qu'en conséquence de l'article 113(1) CBE, une décision doit être dûment motivée afin de démontrer que les parties ont été entendues, c'est-à-dire qu'elle [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 11:59 am by Joe Price
(570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P The post European Trucking Regulations Lead in Sleep Deprivation and Climate Concern Areas Compared to United States appeared first on Dougherty, Leventhal & Price, LLP. [read post]