Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 4,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office) United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:56 am
See Patton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
"In Bose Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
(Musk v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm
To conclude, Passman stated that the decision to choose a trust ultimately comes down to the artist’s goals. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
A mention in this regard may also be made of the developments in the United States and United Kingdom where this right has had [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 2:51 pm
[v] City of Seattle v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
Goodman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Some lawyers who had presented a paper and a sample brief on the subject to the Wisconsin State Public Defender’s Annual Convention five years ago had, and you can read it here. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Procedural: qui tam structure (addressing fraud on the public, misuse of a state grant). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:23 am
In other words, his need toexplain away any results from those tests arose when the samples werecollected, not just when the test results were reported. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:25 am
Consider their #1 state, Delaware: that’s where, in Dambro v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Albritton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
