Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
This entry in the Legal Theory Lexicon provides a rough and ready introduction to speech act theory pitched at law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 pm
,” Zach on Legal Disruption, May 26, 2022 (reviewing various factors, including a “54x valuation” for one CLM provider). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:33 am
Research & meta-reviewsA quick way for us to get into the literature is to make use of meta-reviews (aka meta-analytic reviews, narrative reviews and best-evidence syntheses) which in the broadest sense are summaries of prior research. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
“When A Speech Code Is A Speech Code: The Stanford Policy and the Theory of Incidental Restraints,” University of California at Davis Law Review. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:21 am
Rickey, Margrave Law LLC, on Thursday, May 11, 2017 Tags: Charter & bylaws, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fee-Shifting, In re Trulia, Materiality, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder suits, State law An Activist View of CEO Compensation Posted by David F. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:35 am
Of that 22, exactly one of them (Professor Jeffrey Fisher of Stanford Law) can be described as a criminal defense specialist. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:13 am
(I cataloged these in Nonlethal Self-Defense, (Almost Entirely) Nonlethal Weapons, and the Rights To Keep and Bear Arms and Defend Life, 62 Stanford Law Review 199 (2009).) [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from professors Luca Enriques at Bocconi University, Matteo Gatti at Rutgers Law School, and Roy Shapira at Reichman University (IDC).It is based on their recent article, “How the EU Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Could Reshape Corporate America,” forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review and available here. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
In so doing, they overruled their decision of Stanford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 6:09 am
This is definitely worth reviewing and even I learned a few new words of the trade. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 2:19 pm
Furthermore, the effectiveness of human oversight is questionable, especially when users often accept complex terms of service without careful review. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:26 pm
Accountability Counsel (linked here), a global legal advocacy nonprofit, partnered with Stanford Law School’s Law and Policy Lab to investigate these tools and develop guidelines for adoption. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:15 pm
Design Director at brief point, Bridgette, and Nathan, welcome to The Geek in Review. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Williams (09-466), below, was re-scheduled for review at the January 22 conference. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 3:06 pm
Yet the first time an independent study attempted to verify the agency’s claims, researchers from NYU and Stanford concluded that most of the deaths from drones are collateral deaths. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Once it is recognized either that the divine law’s content is unascertainable or that there is no divine law to ascertain, the law and the state have to be secular and have to maintain their separation from institutions and claims of religious authority. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
” In the National Law Journal (via Law.com), Tony Mauro reviews “a number of missteps” that Kagan made in her year arguing before the Court, and he speculates that they may be used to argue that she is insufficiently seasoned. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
AGGRESSIVE CHARGES Anthony Falzone, Director for Copyright and Fair Use at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society, said it was too early to comment on the strength of the case, but questioned whether some of the allegations in the indictment would actually push Megaupload outside the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:23 am
AGGRESSIVE CHARGES Anthony Falzone, Director for Copyright and Fair Use at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society, said it was too early to comment on the strength of the case, but questioned whether some of the allegations in the indictment would actually push Megaupload outside the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:46 pm
Merryman, a Stanford Law School professor, identified two approaches to cultural property in the 1980s: nationalism and internationalism.[22] In response to the rising support for national patrimony laws and repatriation (“nationalism”), Merryman instead advocated that museums should keep cultural objects since they belong to a shared human heritage (“internationalism”). [read post]
