Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Today, small-business owners celebrate the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Janus v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:46 am
Compliance and E-Discovery: Two Inseparable Risk Management Functions Editor: The United States District Court for the Southern District of California's decision in Qualcomm v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
In wake of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 12:37 am
Environmental Protection and Information Center v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
Again, the case was reversed and remanded, this time by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
This is the California Supreme Court decision of Dillon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm
Or the litigant could live in Winnemucca, a city located outside of California but in the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
In Knox v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
The California Supreme Court will need to resolve these issues soon, regardless of whether the United States Supreme Court takes on any of these issues in the future. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court precedent, the unanimous panel concluded as follows: “Although we agree with Truly Nolen that Concepcion implicitly disapproved the reasoning of the Gentry court, the United States Supreme Court did not directly address the precise issue presented in Gentry. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:09 pm
Here - the landowner is the United States government. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
Moreover, the United States explains, the Sixth Circuit's decision does not conflict with the decision of any other court of appeals. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
In a recent case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, a plaintiff brought a putative class action alleging that defendants, a creditor and a debt collection firm, sent debt collection notices that failed to disclose the current creditor’s name in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the California equivalent. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
By Cori BadgleyIn the recent case of California Forestry Association v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
By Cori BadgleyIn the recent case of California Forestry Association v. [read post]
