Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 3281 - 3300 of 8,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Earle, 405 F.3d 278, 286 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
For processing carried out for journalistic purposes or the purpose of academic artistic or literary expression, Member States shall provide for exemptions or derogations from Chapter II (principles), Chapter III (rights of the data subject), Chapter IV (controller and processor), Chapter V (transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations), Chapter VI (independent supervisory authorities), Chapter VII (cooperation and consistency) and Chapter IX… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
” If an employee fails to cooperate in the process, then the employer cannot be held liable for failing to provide reasonable accommodations. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm by Dan Flynn
 One would repeal the so-called “Chevron” doctrine, so named for a 1984 Supreme Court case of Chevron USA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:25 am
Tillerson, in comments made just before he traveled to Moscow for a high-stakes summit meeting, sought to clear up the United States’ position on Syria while also declaring that President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm by John Elwood
Harris, 15-1262 (which eventually will be recaptioned as Cooper v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:56 pm
Discussions will include the full range of mechanisms covered by the third pillar of the Guiding Principles: from State-based judicial and non-judicial mechanisms to non-State-based remediation and grievance mechanisms involving companies, industry bodies, multi-stakeholder initiatives and regional and international institutions. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]