Search for: "State v. Square" Results 3281 - 3300 of 5,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2016, 8:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A judge in New York City declines to do, and the law remains on the books.The case is Silberberg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
It will be good to know what Bird & Bird's Peter Brownlow and Three New Square's Denise McFarland have to say on this topic -- and on expert evidence too. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" The appropriate standard of review, said the Appellate Division, is whether SCI's determination "was affected by an error of law," citing Mulgrew v Board of Education of the City School District of New York, 87 AD3d 506. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The District Court, however, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and remanded them back to Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 5:56 pm by John A. Gallagher
” In addition, the employer must state whether the basis for the termination was securities related, that is, whether the departing broker was subject to some sort of an investigation or proceeding by a governmental body or a self-regulatory organization such as FINRA. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 8:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
 And, indeed, one could cite the so-called Reconstruction Amendments as well, for they were clearly responses to the carnage of secession and civil war (and, of course, if one is an Ackermanian, the Fourteenth Amendment especially is hard to square with any conventional theory of Article V amendment). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]