Search for: "Study v. State" Results 3281 - 3300 of 15,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Perhaps he is reluctant to embrace the Wilsonian view for the reasons stated above. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
But in subsequent decisions, the Court embraced a more nuanced approach: First, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In his study on family taxation, Bittker concluded that the ideal treatment of joint and single  filers comes down to one’s assumptions about how the code should acknowledge the role of marriage and the family as a recognizable social, financial, and legal entity.[5] Avoiding the thornier questions of how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ought to evaluate marriage as a societal entity and parse income-earning members in a family,[6] if one accepts that married filers are simply… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am by Howard Friedman
(forthcoming 2020).Ioanna Tourkochoriti, How Far Should the State Go to Counter Prejudice? [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
  It has been proven that an obese child will most likely be an obese adult: according to the Bogalusa Heart Study, 77 % participants, who were obese as children, remain obese as adults, while only 7%, who were at healthy weight as children, became obese adults. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Federal Court of Appeal, agreeing with the Board, stated that the real purpose or motive behind the copies was instruction, not private study. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
In the United States, the President awards the National Medal of Freedom. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm by Peter Margulies
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:57 am by SHG
Notably, they left out federal actors, which was later extended by the Supreme Court in Bivens v. [read post]
On June 12th, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, filed its decision in Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Simply stated, if the Mandiant report was not created in anticipation of litigation, then per Judge Anderson, it is not subject to the work-product doctrine protection. [read post]