Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 3281 - 3300 of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
As to specific points in the EC Consultation, this is what UK Government thinks:Robust ...Cross-border portabilityThe UK is in favour of increasing cross-border availability of content services by means of market-led licensing arrangements [possibly similar, to a certain extent, to the Copyright Hub? [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
” Manila previously called for joint patrols in response to Chinese test flights last month on Fiery Cross Reef. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm by Nadia Kayyali
By “quickly and efficiently cross-referenc[ing] census data” with myriad other data sets, IBM machines directly aided the Nazis in confiscating Jewish property and targeting people for forced sterilization. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
Some people in Cupertino should listen to the official recording (MP3) of yesterday's Federal Circuit hearing on the cross-appeal relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am by Joseph Fishkin
[Cross-posted on the Election Law Blog as part of a symposium this week on Partisan Gerrymandering after Rucho.]When I teach Rucho, I expect it will pair well with Colegrove v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm by Susan Brenner
Moreover, Dixon directs us to Herrera's testimony, wherein Herrera, on cross-examination, admitted several times that the cell phone belonged to Dixon. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by Randy Barnett
” Of course, he admits that his cross-cutting considerations are “competing” and therefore difficult to satisfy. [read post]